General

Topic 6 of 22

Back to General
Tools

Why Oil Tankers Have Less Freeboard

Learn why oil tankers are assigned less freeboard: fewer closable openings, small hatch area, greater subdivision, low tank permeability (~5%), lighter cargo density and powerful pumping.

Published by ChartandKeel Updated

1. Freeboard & Why It Is Assigned

Freeboard is the distance from the waterline to the top of the deck plating at the side amidships. It represents the ship's reserve buoyancy — the watertight volume above the waterline that keeps the ship afloat if she is flooded or heavily loaded.

Why the Freeboard Varies Between Ship Types:

  • Freeboard is assigned under the Load Line Convention and depends on the ship's structure, openings and subdivision.
  • A ship with many large, hard-to-close openings needs a larger freeboard to keep water out.
  • A ship whose openings are few, small and easily closed, and whose internal subdivision limits flooding, needs less freeboard.

The tanker advantage. An oil tanker is a "closed" ship — few openings, strong subdivision, low permeability and powerful pumping. It therefore needs less reserve buoyancy (less freeboard) than a bulk carrier or container ship of similar size.

Figure 1: Freeboard distance and reserve-buoyancy volumeA reused transverse hull section separates the vertical freeboard dimension from shaded enclosed reserve-buoyancy volume above the summer load waterline. Immersed hull and freeboard deck are distinct.Freeboard is a distance · reserve buoyancy is volumeReused hull section · intact enclosed space above the summer load waterlineEnclosed reserve volumeCross-section shaded for illustrationImmersed hullFreeboard deckFreeboard distanceSummer load waterlineAt side: upper edge of deck line → upper edge of the applicable load line. Reserve buoyancy comes from enclosed, effective volume above the waterline. Closing integrity and the applicable stability assessment remain essential.
Figure 1: Freeboard & Reserve Buoyancy. Freeboard is the reserve buoyancy above the waterline; it depends on openings, closing efficiency, subdivision, permeability and structural strength — all of which favour a small freeboard on a tanker.

2. The Reasons Oil Tankers Have Less Freeboard

There are several reasons an oil tanker is assigned less freeboard:

  1. Fewer openings: Oil tankers have fewer openings compared with other ships, and those openings can be closed efficiently.
  2. Small hatch area: Oil tankers have a smaller area of hatch opening compared with bulk carriers and container ships.
  3. Greater structural strength: Because of the reduced openings, the structural strength is greater and safer, which allows a smaller freeboard.
  4. Greater subdivision: The tanker has greater subdivision by transverse and longitudinal bulkheads.
  5. Low permeability: The permeability of an oil-filled tank is only about 5%, compared with a grain cargo hold of 60–65%, so the ingress of water in a bilge compartment is much less.
  6. Lower cargo density: The density of cargo oil is less than grain cargo.
  7. Better pumping: A tanker has a much larger and better pumping arrangement to control any bilge water.

The permeability number to remember. Oil-filled tank ≈ 5% permeability vs grain hold ≈ 60–65%. If a compartment is breached, far less water enters an oil tank, so the flooding and loss of stability are much smaller — a key reason for the reduced freeboard.

3. Permeability, Subdivision & Pumping

Permeability Comparison:

Compartment / CargoPermeability (µ)Water Ingress
Oil-filled tank (tanker)≈ 5%Very small
Grain cargo hold (bulk)60–65%Very large
Machinery space≈ 85%Very large
Accommodation≈ 95%Almost total

Why Subdivision Matters:

  • A tanker is divided by both transverse and longitudinal bulkheads, creating many small compartments.
  • If one compartment is breached, flooding is confined to a small volume, so the loss of buoyancy and any list is limited.
  • This greater subdivision means the ship can survive damage with less reserve buoyancy — hence a smaller freeboard.

Better Pumping Arrangement:

  • Tankers have large, powerful cargo pumps and stripping systems able to move fluid rapidly between tanks.
  • Any water entering a compartment (from leakage or condensation) can be pumped out and controlled, reducing the accumulation that would otherwise threaten stability.

Surveyor asks: "Why do tankers have less freeboard?" Give the reasons in order: fewer/closeable openings → smaller hatch area → greater structural strength → greater subdivision → low permeability (≈5% vs 60–65%) → lighter oil cargo → better pumping.

Figure 3: Floodable volume, subdivision and dewateringReused longitudinal hull with one flooded compartment and intact watertight boundaries. Equal-volume permeability examples distinguish occupied material from floodable volume. A separate suction, strainer, pump, non-return valve and approved outlet show capacity-limited dewatering.Floodable space · watertight boundaries · pump capacityPermeability μ = floodable volume / compartment volumeWatertight subdivision · reused longitudinal sectionIntactDamagedWaterIntactIntact boundaries limit spread while closures and penetrations remain tight.Permeability · equal total volumesμ = 0.20μ = 0.80Blue = available flooded volumeDewatering · capacity-limitedFlooded spacePumpNRV / outletApproved outletContinued ingress can exceed pump delivery.
Figure 3: Permeability, Subdivision & Pumping. Oil tanks have ~5% permeability versus 60–65% for grain, the tanker is finely subdivided by transverse and longitudinal bulkheads, and powerful pumping controls any water.

4. Comparison & Summary

FeatureOil TankerBulk / Container
OpeningsFew, efficiently closedMany / large
Hatch opening areaSmallLarge
Structural strength (deck)Greater / saferReduced by large openings
SubdivisionTransverse + longitudinal B/HMainly transverse
Compartment permeability≈ 5% (oil tank)60–65% (grain hold)
Cargo densityLower than grainHigher (grain)
Pumping arrangementMuch larger / betterSmaller
Resulting freeboardLessMore

One-line answer. Oil tankers have less freeboard because fewer, smaller and easily closed openings, greater structural strength and subdivision, very low tank permeability (≈5%), lighter cargo density and far better pumping all reduce the risk and consequence of flooding, so less reserve buoyancy is required.

Figure 4: Type A tanker and Type B dry-cargo examplesTwo longitudinal hull drawings reuse the same #164 outline. The upper liquid-bulk example has small gasketed access covers and subdivided loaded tanks. The lower dry-cargo example has larger hatch covers and holds. Different waterlines illustrate conditional, not universal, freeboard differences.Different deck integrity · conditional freeboard assignmentSame reused hull outline for comparison; not two actual vessel load-line calculationsA · liquid bulk / small watertight access coversLoaded-space permeability and subdivision contribute to flooding safety.Smaller FB*B · dry cargo / larger weathertight hatch coversHold and hatch arrangement shown is illustrative, not a Type B requirement.Larger FB**Illustrative difference only: assigned freeboard depends on all applicable conditions. Type A criteria include liquid-bulk design, deck integrity and small watertight accesses. Type B covers other ships; approved reduced-freeboard arrangements also exist. Low permeability or a powerful pump alone is not a freeboard-assignment entitlement.
Figure 4: Tanker vs Dry Cargo. The tanker's small openings, dense subdivision and low permeability contrast with the bulk carrier's large hatches and high permeability, explaining the tanker's smaller freeboard.